Category : mountaintop musings

Some terminology for the purposes of this article:

• XR: Extended/Extensible Reality, or possibly just (x)R – an umbrella term covering all forms of simulated and mediated reality. (note: let’s agree to pronounce the “x” as a “z” like xylophone, so XR sounds like the bad guy from The Last Starfighter)
• VR: Virtual Reality – a form of XR characterised by blocking out of the “real” world, providing a total immersion in a wholly simulated environment.
• AR: Augmented Reality – XR in which the real world remains visible (either directly, or via a camera feed), and computer generated elements are added to mediate reality. (and sounds like a pirate noise)
• GPU: Graphics Processing Unit – the card / components that drive the visuals of the VR experience. Usually a dedicated card in desktop computers, but built into the motherboard on many laptops.
• eGPU: External GPU – A GPU in an external case, usually connected by Thunderbolt to the main system.

A few weeks ago, here in the sticks of regional Australia, we had a little conference day (immerseconf), with internationally practicing artists from all over the country (including the head of HTC Vive in Australia), demoing how various forms of Extended Reality are being used by artists to create content.

Interestingly, while there was a “serious games” (training & education simulations) discussion, traditional entertainment videogames weren’t covered – this was a conference targeted at makers, and the toolsets available to them for creating. This shouldn’t be taken as indicating the experience was dull – delight and joy are inherent to the experience of doing work in VR.

I’ve been reading about and waiting for this tech since the 1980s. Last time I tried it a couple of years ago, the head-mounted display (goggles) was an Oculus devkit, and interaction was via a playstation controller.

I was ill within a minute.

A theory of why this happens, is that it’s a result of lag between moving your head, and seeing the corresponding movement of the virtual world through the goggles. With the Vive, that problem is solved – the viewpoint is stuck fast to your proprioceptive experience of movement. Lag is gone, you are there.

For an artist, the experience of VR marks a division between everything you have done, learned or experienced in art-making prior, and what you are to do afterwards. It is as redefining an experience as postulated in Crosley Bendix’s discussion of the “discovery” of the new primary colour “Squant”.

In my life, I have been literally moved to tears once by a work I saw in an exhibition – Picasso’s “Head of a Woman”. Why? I had  studied this work, part of the canon of historically important constructed sculpture, for years at art school. I’d written essays concerning, and answered slide tests about it. However, every photo I had seen was in black and white. I finally saw it in the flesh at an exhibition, and out of nowhere found myself weeping at the fact that I had never known what colour it was painted. Nothing I had read, or studied, prepared me for the overwhelming emotional impact of meeting it, face to face, and realising that I had not known something as fundamental as its colour.

Of all the great leaps in art making that Picasso was personally involved with, it was his collaboration with Julio González that more or less invented welded steel sculpture. He did this, primarily out of a desire to be able to “take a line for a walk” in three dimensions, to draw with thin metal rod, the only material whose structural strength could span distance without thickness or sagging.

In VR, free-standing, able to walk about with multi-function hand controllers in an entirely simulated, blank environment, I was once again almost in tears at how profound the experience of this tech is for artmaking. One can literally take a line for a walk, twist it, loop it around itself, trace out the topology of knots, zoom out, zoom inside, and see that three dimensional drawing as a physical object, hanging in the air.

The tools I played with were from Google – Blocks, a simple 3d modelling program, and Tilt Brush, a drawing and painting program (which is also a 3d modeller – it just models paint strokes, and so produces flat ribbons of paint, that follow the 3D orientation of the controller when you make them). They’re reasonably primitive compared to traditional 2D painting and modelling apps, but there’s clearly a commercial space for selling tools for VR.

Just watch this. That’s the actual experience  of creating and working in Tilt Brush.

Or this:

Why would you want to use a screen-based 3d modeller?

Speculation, based on Observation:

• The authoring environment for VR content, is VR.
  • After 3D modelling, or drawing in VR, you’ll never want to model or paint on a screen again. The idea of not having a direct 3d experience while creating just becomes nonsensical. As for Tilt Brush, there’s no 2D equivalent, I’m not sure there’s even a way to think about how Tilt Brush would work in 2d.
  • Don’t think about VR as a way to preview things you make on screen – making things in VR is so compelling, you will want to change the way you work, or change the sort of work you do, to get as much as possible into the immersion.
• 360 Video is probably going to end up being a niche or gimmick, like 3d television.
  • The very clear sense I have after this encounter, is that 360 Video (which I first saw demonstrated 16 years ago at the QTVR Forum at Macworld New York) is an attempt by an old, established artform (and players within that artform), to annex a new format for itself, regardless of whether it is appropriate for that new format. If all you have is a hammer, you treat everything as if it were a nail.
  • Outside of video art – time-lapses of locations, or documentary, 360 video may be a way to make video skyboxes and motion backgrounds, at least until software can make them more effectively than a film crew can shoot a real location, which if you look at any modern film, it can already do.
  • Video’s monopoly on “real” will not survive the growth in quality of simulation, which carries with it true interactivity. Why experience a 360 video version of surfing, when you can have a photoreal simulated surfing experience, in which you do more than control the direction you’re looking, and can have it on that water planet in Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar?
  • If 360 video fundamentally changes its nature, becoming something in which the narrative progression is reactive to the directed attention of the viewer, perhaps there’s a possibility there, but isn’t that just a video game with the skill tests removed?
  • Otherwise, how do you get a jumpscare to work, if the viewer is never looking in the direction of the monster? Interactivity and moving around within a place is VR’s point. 360 video is about being a fixed point. Think of it as similar to the way focus-pulling and depth of field are fundamentally incompatible with 3d cinema – viewers can struggle against the director’s chosen point of focus, trying to see unfocussed objects they physiologically understand they should be able to “grip” with their eyes and pull into focus.
  • There are also issues with the physics of optics, revolving around how panoramic images are captured, that make stereo separation with 360 video fundamentally problematic.
  • Using VR headsets to screen non-interactive, immersive stereoscopic 3D video (in other words, you only see what the single direction paired cameras are pointed at) would certainly seem to have a future, given the pornography industry has adopted it for the Point Of View genre.
• VR is a platform, not a peripheral.
  • This is huge – Mac, Windows, Linux – all of these are irrelevant, you’re simply not going to interact with the host OS to any meaningful degree. The operating system of the computer, merely serves as the loader for the VR environment. You’ll have no more cause to interact with macOS or Windows, than you do to interact with your computer’s firmware. Tilt Brush will look like Tilt Brush, regardless of what operating system it is running on. Look at Adobe’s clear strategy to nullify the operating system as a differentiator, and get their users to think of their computers as “Creative Suite Workstations” rather than “Macs or PCs running Creative Suite”. VR will be even moreso.
  • Everything is up for grabs as new paradigms for fundamental control schemes are solidified. Think how revolutionary the first pull-down menu was, that’s the sort of world VR is in. From Blocks and Tilt Brush you can see already, UI paradigms that are perhaps overly-literal. Multi-sided, rotatable physical palettes wrapped around the controllers are in vogue, but why? Why not have the equivalent of a 30″ monitor, offset 45 degrees, full of palettes that appears in response to a button press, then goes away again? Or, why not a literal wheeled toolbox, that follows behind you? The physicality of creating in VR is a very different working experience to sitting at a desk.
• The GPU is everything.
  • VR computers are just a host system for the GPU (Graphics Card). A non-upgradable GPU, or a system that can’t be traded up for the market retail cost of a GPU is a laughable idea, truly laughable. Once you use one of these systems and see how good it is, but more importantly how much better VR is going to get in the near future in terms of graphical fidelity, and  consider the soon to arrive retina-scale upgrade to headset display densities, the thought of having to replace a whole computer, just to keep cutting edge, I mean it’s just an unthinkably stupid idea.
    • To put that in perspective, no matter what manufacturers claim, Nvidia’s 1080ti is the minimum graphics card you need to create a simple virtual environment of sufficient fidelity that you’d want to spend all day working within. That is the standard you have to show people, so they can think “this is here and I want to use it“.
    • The 1080ti is the second-fastest GPU Nvidia offers in terms of 3D gaming performance, which is the effective measure of how well the immersive environment will perform.
    • The 1080ti is around 30% faster than the fastest performing GPU AMD makes (Vega 64), for a significantly lower power draw and heat output.
    • Numerous developers, including HTC themselves, were demoing on laptops with Nvidia graphics – none of which required eGPUs. HTC’s laptop was subtly lower fidelity than the desktop machines, but not by a lot.
    • AMD graphics cards were nowhere to be seen. Every tower machine (which were bigger than my cheesegrater Classic Mac Pro, and mostly full of empty space) was team green (Nvidia).
• VR has a huge future in healthcare.
  • Hospitals here are permanently installing Vive trackers in the children’s wards, so bedridden kids can go participate in networked virtual environments with other kids, and not be bored / confronted with the reality of being in hospital.
  • VR is being used for rehabilitation, gamifying physiotherapy rehab exercises for example, to ensure they’re done correctly, and to relieve the monotony of repeat-based therapy.

Food for Thought, AR vs VR:

There is a school of opinion which holds that AR is the “good” version of XR, that VR is a niche for games, that the goggles etc required for immersion makes VR inherently not a thing for the everyperson.

I have a different take on that. I think that AR would seem to be the “good” version of XR, vs full immersion VR, if you’re the sort of person whose socioeconomic status means your life is the sort of life from which you would never want to seek an escape. AR is lovely, if you’re able-bodied, rich, have a nice house, and a job with sufficient seniority that you have your own office and can shut out distraction.

In other words, if you’re employed with any sort of decision-making authority at a large tech company.

If you live in a tiny apartment or room in a sharehouse, or have a disability whose profundity stops you going out to access experiences, or work in a place where you can’t tune out visual distraction, in other words, if your life isn’t already the sort of 1%er fantasy that most people would like to escape to, then perhaps AR isn’t that compelling in comparison.

From that perspective, AR that does not have a “shut out the real world” function isn’t a complete solution – it’s not the whole story.

By the way, saying the goggles are inconvenient – go speak to anyone who does any sort of manual trade work. VR goggles are no more inconvenient than having to wear safety glasses, gloves, steel-capped boots, ear muffs, a respirator, or welding helmet. Just because it’s less convenient than an office worker is used to, doesn’t mean a lot – if I can sketch in 3d before I go out into the welding bay, that’s a huge convenience factor.

So Overall:

My encounter with Vive leaves me with mixed emotions. I am absolutely going to be gearing up for VR. You simply can’t try this tech, and then not move to make art with it. VR is here, and it is now. It is a complete, usable product with both entertainment, and work tools, not an early-access developer preview.

A lot of the coverage I’ve seen of VR, from people who perhaps don’t understand the sheer amount of heavy lifting necessary to drive the experience, centres around ideas like “wait until the PC isn’t required“. That isn’t going to happen, or rather, that’s going to be a sub-standard experience – a better packaging of current smartphone-based VR. The PC to drive VR isn’t going to go away, because the progress to be made in the medium, the complexity and graphical fidelity has so much room for growth that enthusiasts will keep asking for more, and content creators will have to keep up in order to feed that cycle.

Local Australian pricing has the Vive setup for about a thousand dollars, an Nvidia 1080ti for about another thousand, but what to do for a computer to run that rig?

Does Apple have a solution that lets me stay on the Mac, or do I jump to Windows, and begin the inevitable migration of all my Pro software (which is niche enough that it HAS to be cross platform) and production processes across to Windows versions?

Read on in Part 2: Hard Reality

Hey, If you liked reading this, maybe you’d like to donate?

Disclaimer:

A couple of years after writing this, I found the officially sanctioned way of doing what I’m doing here. It’s based on the Time Machine command-line utilities. I’ve used it since, and it works well.

Here it is: https://www.baligu.com/pondini/TM/B6.html

If you want to see what’s happening while time machine is doing its run, you can try this from the command line:

log stream –style syslog –predicate ‘senderImagePath contains[cd] “TimeMachine”‘ –info

Anyway, back to the original article:

…or, how to make Time Machine treat a duplicated and enlarged source volume as the original, and continue incremental backups.

It’s not supposed to be possible, but after 3 days of research, and multiple 4-8 hour backup sessions, I’ve cracked it – done something that, as far as I can tell, noone else believes can be done, or has documented how to do. If you follow the instructions here, using only free tools, you’ll be able to do it as well.

The Problem:

You have a Time Machine drive handling backup for multiple drives attached to your system. For example:

Boot / User: 500gb, Photos: 900GB.

Right now, your Time Machine backup is around 1.4TB minimum. On a 2TB drive, that leaves you with 600GB for historical versions of files. Every time you change a file in any way, another copy of the file is added to the Time Machine volume.

Let’s assume your Photos drive is 1TB, and you need to move the contents onto a larger drive before it runs out of space.

You plug in a new 2TB drive, format it with the same name, copy the contents of the Photos drive across, remove the old Photos drive.

You let Time Machine do its thing.

Time Machine will treat the new 2TB Photos drive as a different drive from the original, and perform a full backup of the drive, even though the data on it is identical in every way. Using Carbon Copy Cloner, or Disk Utility’s Restore function will not get around this.

Your Time machine storage now requires: Boot / User: 500GB, Photos (old): 900GB, Photos (new): 900GB, for a total of 2300GB. You’ve now got a backup that’s larger than your 2TB Time Machine volume, and importantly, Time Machine will delete all your historical backups in order to make room for what will effectively be two identical copies of most of your photos.

The Cause:

This happens because Time Machine uses the UUID of the drive to identify it. The UUID is assigned to the drive when it is formatted in Disk Utility, it’s effectively random, and is unaffected by changes to the name of a drive. This means you can change the name of your drive without triggering a full backup, it also means the integrity of your Time Machine backups can’t be effected by temporarily plugging in another drive of the same name, even if the contents are mostly identical.

In general, it’s a safety feature, but as above, it has a serious drawback.

The Solution:

In order to make the enlarged drive behave as a continuation of the old one, you have to fool Time Machine into thinking the new drive is the old one. To do this, you have to copy the data correctly, alter the new drive’s UUID to match the original, then alter the original drive’s UUID so it doesn’t conflict.

Tools You’ll Need:

Note: this is how I made it work – some stuff here may not be totally necessary, but as anyone who used SCSI back in the day knows, superstition is an important part of technology.

1. A separate bootable MacOS drive / partition where you’ll do all the tasks (to avoid the possibility that your normal system will record what you do in the filesystem events record), and in which you’ve switched off Time Machine. We’ll refer to it as “Tools“. Not the (probably internal) drive you use normally, which we’ll refer to as “MyMac“.
2. The old (nearly full) drive – “Photos” for this example.
3. The new larger drive.
4. A USB thumb drive.
5. A copy of Shirt-Pocket’s SuperDuper.
6. A plain text file to act as a scratchpad for copying and pasting things (there’s a pre-formatted version of the whole process below, as a cheat-sheet once you read the process and understand what to do).

Method:

1. Boot your mac from the normal MyMac drive.
   1. Run a Time Machine backup.
   2. Switch off Time Machine in System Preferences.
2. Reboot to Tools.
   1. Download and install SuperDuper (to Applications on the Tools drive).
   2. Open Disk Utility
      1. Plug in and format the new larger drive as a standard Mac volume (HFS+ Journalled, case insensitive – make it match the drive you want to clone). The name doesn’t matter.
      2. Plug in and format the USB thumb Drive as a standard Mac volume.
      3. Get info on the old Photos drive, and note down its UUID in your text file. (Depending on the version of Disk Utility you have, you might have to get this from the System Information in About This Mac.)
      4. Select your Photos drive on the left, and use the Restore function to copy it onto the new larger drive (probably called “Untitled”).
      5. Wait some hours while it does its thing. Restore uses block copy which ensures the files aren’t touched or changed by being copied.
      6. Note down the UUID of the new version of Photos on your text file. This is so you can ensure it’s changed later on.
   3. Go to Finder, navigate to where you have installed SuperDuper (Applications).
      1. Right click on SuperDuper, choose “Show Package Contents”, then navigate to Contents / MacOS /
      2. Make sure you can see the exec file SDDiskTool.
   4. Open Terminal.
      1. change directory to the MacOS directory above – you’re going to be using SDDiskTool from the command line, but your comand has to be run from within this directory. The easiest way to do this is (the angle brackets are for actions don’t type them) :

         cd <drag the "MacOS" title icon in the titlebar of the window to here> <hit enter>

      2. Get the UUID in encoded form from the original Photos drive:

         ./SDDiskTool -g <drag old Photos source disk from Finder> <enter>

      3. You’ll see a string of characters returned to the next line, before your command prompt. This is the encoded UUID. Important: Copy those characters to your text file for safe keeping. Be careful selecting them, as they’ll run into the name of your machine at the command prompt.
      4. Set the encoded UUID to the new Photos drive:

         sudo ./SDDiskTool -s <paste the encoded uuid> <drag new Photos target disk from Finder> <enter>

      5. Enter the admin password for your Tools drive system Admin account.
   5. Quit Disk Utility (it has to be relaunched to see the new UUID)
   6. Eject BOTH Photos drives in Finder.
   7. Relaunch Disk Utility and mount the new Photos drive.
      1. Copy the UUID to your text file, and check it matches the original Photos drive version.
      2. Unmount the new Photos drive.
      3. Remount the old Photos drive.
   8. Repeat this process to assign the UUID from the USB thumb drive to your old Photos drive, so that when you reboot to MyMac it won’t confuse Time machine (or, to be super safe physically unplug the old photos drive, do step 9, then reboot to Tools and do this step).
   9. Reboot to MyMac and (eject the old Photos drive if you haven’t changed its UUID) then manually trigger a Time Machine backup – you should be able to tell pretty quickly if it’s worked by the size of the backup that’ll be performed. If it’s the same, or larger than your Photos drive, it hasn’t worked. In which case, stop it, delete the .inprogress file from the Backups.backupdb folder on your Time Machine drive, and start the process from scratch – that’s why you kept the encoded UUID numbers, if you’ve overwritten the old Photos drive UUID with that from the thumbdrive, the encoded value is the only way to assign it. If you open Console, go to System Log, All Messages on the left, then fill in the filter search field on the top right with com.apple.backupd prior to triggering the backup, it’ll tell you how much will be backed up from your various drives. If you’ve done a backup immediately prior to this whole process, then the first backup you do afterwards should be negligible.
   10. If it all worked OK, turn Time Machine automatic backups back on.
   11. If it all goes wrong, and you can’t get the UUIDs to copy, or the copying to stick – my suggestion is to go into the Time Machine history browsing interface when you’re on your whole computer in a Finder window, where you can see all your drives, right click on the photos drive in your most recent level of backup, and delete all backups of photos (they’re safe on your old Photos drive). That will then clear off all your photos backups, meaning that there’s space on the drive to put an entire fresh backup of Photos onto the Time Machine drive, without deleting the historical backups from your Boot / User drive. This is basically where you were going to end up in the first place.

Standard Disclaimer: I take no responsibility for you hosing all of your data and backups doing this. It’s working for me, and I pieced it together and adapted it from bits around the web – mostly relating to how SuperDuper handles working with multiple drives. I suggest doing a practice run with a couple of thumbdrives to make sure you can do it properly.

Cheat Sheet:

1 install Superduper
2 launch terminal
3 cd to inside superduper bundle contents / MacOS
4 ./SDDiskTool -g <drag source disk> <enter>
5 copy encoded uuid
6 sudo ./SDDiskTool -s <paste the uuid> <drag target disk> <enter>
7 enter password
8 unmount disk, quit disk utility, relaunch disk utility and remount disk
9 Write & Check UUIDs
 
 Drive:
 Current UUID: XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX <- The drive you're cloning *to*
 Desired UUID: XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX <- The drive you're cloning *from*
 Encoded UUID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 Altered UUID: XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX <- Drive you're cloning *to*
                                                       after the process, should match Desired UUID.

Dedicated in part to the memory of the late James “Pondini” Pond.

Thanks to Dave Nanian and Shirt Pocket Software for producing SDDiskTool.

If this article was of use, a donation would help support my projects.

Something that I’ve been increasingly feeling, as I get to 23 years within the Apple software and hardware ecosystem, is how often the way Apple’s products function can best be described as “careless“.

Careless, as in “very little care was put into thinking about how this product would function“, or rather, “no care was put into thinking about how this would fail to function“. You see, if you’ve been using Apple products lately, what you’ll notice is that overwhelmingly, they’ve become black boxes – iCloud for example, when it breaks, how do you fix it? Where do you find the canonical copy of your data, to ensure it’s correct? How do you force a device to sync its data?

You don’t. The entire thing is designed on the premise that it works perfectly, and thus, it contains no manual overrides, no diagnostics, no repairs, it’s just a black box. What’s the way to “fix” iCloud problems? Switch it off, and switch it on again.

Seriously.

That’s the way to fix it. Log out of iCloud, and log back in again. Then, spend days finding things that don’t work any more because when you log back in, all the things that were logged out, aren’t automatically reconnected. Facetime, Messages, ApplePay all these things need their own authentication, and nothing is done to automate that process.

Which brings me to my current bugbear – Time Machine.

Time Machine is typical Apple – it claims to work, it claims to be simple, and when it fails, well, why would it ever fail? Why would anyone need to do anything beyond press one button to start it?

My workstation has a boot/user drive, 1TB Photos drive, and a 2TB Time Machine drive, which is redundantly paired to a second 2TB external Time Machine USB drive. The Photos drive is almost full, and its size the effective limiter on how much space is left over in the backup for older versions of my user drive files – so to upgrade it, I also have to upgrade my time machine drive(s).

A new 4TB drive is installed, formatted, and ready to roll, so I follow Apple’s official guide for how to migrate to a larger Time Machine volume, I set the permissions of the new drive, then copy the backup folder from the old drive, to the new one.

Finder begins “Preparing to copy”. Seven hours later, it is still preparing to copy. There is no estimated time remaining, no progress bar, just a number of files which keeps getting higher. I leave my 200+ watt at idle 12 core Xeon workstation running all night, and the next morning check in, expecting to see the copy has finished.

Nope.

What my high-power space heater has been doing, for who knows how long, is sitting, doing nothing, while Finder waits for me to authenticate so the system to elevate its privileges to actually copy the files.

Why the hell did that not happen at the start of the process?

Well, you see there are security implications…

No. No you don’t get to have that excuse. This is a process with an entire working day spent just to get ready to do the task, and then another estimated 20+ hours to do the actual copy, as software developers, you have no right to demand user interaction inside that block of time. Time Machine should never have made it out of the lab, without a dedicated App that handles migrating backups between disks – an app that works reliably, an app that stores all the authentication details that will be needed, and which can work around errors, and continue the backup while logging things that go wrong for the user’s attention. Why is all that required?

Three hours after the copy started, it failed. Finder could not complete the operation because an unknown error occurred error -50.

So, 11 hours wasted.

Now, a second attempt is being made, this time using Disk Utility to restore the old backup drive to the new one, using a block copy. It’s about 1/8th of the way through, and saying 7 hours remaining.

I’ve encountered an interesting bug in Autopano Giga (APG), a product from Kolor, as subsidiary of GoPro.

The Symptom:

Whenever APG is running, it constantly triggers the Mac wifi control software airportd to actively scan for available WIFI networks.

This happens when the system is connected via Ethernet, and not even using WIFI for its network traffic.

This happens despite options to send analytics, and check for beta versions being disabled.

Below, is 10 seconds of captured logfile from OS X’s wifi.log, covering launch, and then immediate quit.

287 lines of logfile in 10 seconds, and that rate continues for as long as the software is running. Once again, this machine is not using WIFI for any actual network traffic, and APG isn’t transmitting any data over this – it’s merely waking up the WIFI system, and telling it to scan the local basestations, and then writing a massive amount of data to multiple logfiles. God only knows what this would do to the battery life on a portable.

Turning off WIFI is the only way to make it stop.

The Cause:

Kolor’s official twitter account suggested to me that this is caused by APG looking for updates.

• Where’s the setting to turn off checking for updates? I’ve turned off checking for beta versions, that makes no difference.
• APG attempts to connect to google on quit, which you would only know if you had Little Snitch installed and telling you what apps are trying to phone home behind your back.
• If it is an update check, why is APG looking for updates, every (approximately) 5 seconds as long as it is running?
• Why is it powering up the WIFI scan, when the system is set to use Ethernet as its network?

The Horror:

Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.378 IPC: <airportd[54]> ADDED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.379 Info: <airportd[54]> SCAN request received from pid 1017 (AutopanoGiga) with priority 0
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.379 <airportd[54]> WARNING: AutopanoGiga (1017) is not entitled for com.apple.wifi.scan, temporarily allowing request with background priority —— all entitlement requirements will be strictly enforced in a future release
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.380 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.380 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::scanDone: Scheduling cache purge timer in 30 seconds.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 Driver Event: <airportd[54]> _bsd_80211_event_callback: SCAN_CACHE_UPDATED (en2)
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8508670> [channelNumber=1(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8506410> [channelNumber=2(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8508a70> [channelNumber=3(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8509ea0> [channelNumber=4(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8510260> [channelNumber=5(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8512a50> [channelNumber=6(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 )} took 0.1901 seconds, returned 2 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 Info: <Wi-Fi Menu Extra[289]> scan cache updated
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.571 Info: <airportd[54]> QUERY SCAN CACHE request received from pid 220 (locationd)
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.760 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850f5e0> [channelNumber=7(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8508790> [channelNumber=8(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8525b70> [channelNumber=9(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850bc80> [channelNumber=10(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba85270f0> [channelNumber=11(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8527030> [channelNumber=36(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 )} took 0.1907 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.761 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba85084b0> [channelNumber=40(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850f7b0> [channelNumber=44(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba853ff70> [channelNumber=48(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851b2a0> [channelNumber=149(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851b6c0> [channelNumber=153(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851bae0> [channelNumber=157(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 )} took 0.2124 seconds, returned 1 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.973 Driver Event: <airportd[54]> _bsd_80211_event_callback: SCAN_CACHE_UPDATED (en2)
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.974 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.974 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:01.975 Info: <airportd[54]> QUERY SCAN CACHE request received from pid 220 (locationd)
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.669 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.669 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.669 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851bf00> [channelNumber=161(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.669 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851c320> [channelNumber=165(5GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.669 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8508c20> [channelNumber=12(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8528c90> [channelNumber=13(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850fa90> [channelNumber=52(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850e990> [channelNumber=56(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 )} took 0.6960 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 Info: <Wi-Fi Menu Extra[289]> scan cache updated
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:02.670 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8529710> [channelNumber=60(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8529b30> [channelNumber=64(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8529f50> [channelNumber=100(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8511e30> [channelNumber=104(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850fd50> [channelNumber=108(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850ee50> [channelNumber=112(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.589 )} took 0.9198 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.590 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:03.590 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850f270> [channelNumber=116(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850dfe0> [channelNumber=120(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba850e400> [channelNumber=124(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.512 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8519cb0> [channelNumber=128(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851a0d0> [channelNumber=132(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851a4f0> [channelNumber=136(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 )} took 0.9229 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 Info: <Wi-Fi Menu Extra[289]> scan cache updated
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.513 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Initiating scan.
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.790 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.790 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.790 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba851a910> [channelNumber=140(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.790 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba85123b0> [channelNumber=144(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.790 )} took 0.2771 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:04.799 IPC: <airportd[54]> INVALIDATED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:06.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::startScan: Broadcast scan request received from 'airportd' (pid 54) ().
Mon Apr 3 16:49:06.570 <kernel> IO80211ScanManager::getScanResult: All scan results returned for 'airportd' (pid 54).
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.244 IPC: <airportd[54]> ADDED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.245 Info: <airportd[54]> SCAN request received from pid 1017 (AutopanoGiga) with priority 0
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 1 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 2 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 3 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 4 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 5 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 6 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba890fa00> [channelNumber=1(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8912810> [channelNumber=2(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba890fa60> [channelNumber=3(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8912800> [channelNumber=4(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba890fea0> [channelNumber=5(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8916fe0> [channelNumber=6(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 )} took 0.0004 seconds, returned 2 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 7 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 8 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 9 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 10 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 11 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 36 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89034d0> [channelNumber=7(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89035a0> [channelNumber=8(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8916590> [channelNumber=9(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8918220> [channelNumber=10(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.246 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba890eab0> [channelNumber=11(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba891ba00> [channelNumber=36(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 40 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 44 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 48 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 149 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 153 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 157 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba891be20> [channelNumber=40(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8910220> [channelNumber=44(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8910640> [channelNumber=48(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8927d90> [channelNumber=149(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89281b0> [channelNumber=153(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89285d0> [channelNumber=157(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 )} took 0.0003 seconds, returned 1 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 161 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 165 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 12 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 13 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 52 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 56 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89289f0> [channelNumber=161(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8928e10> [channelNumber=165(5GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba890eba0> [channelNumber=12(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba891b8a0> [channelNumber=13(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8910a60> [channelNumber=52(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8910f50> [channelNumber=56(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 60 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 64 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 100 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 104 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 108 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 112 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89241b0> [channelNumber=60(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89245d0> [channelNumber=64(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.247 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89249f0> [channelNumber=100(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8924e10> [channelNumber=104(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8910d20> [channelNumber=108(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8925720> [channelNumber=112(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 116 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 120 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 124 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 128 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 132 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 136 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8925b40> [channelNumber=116(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8925f60> [channelNumber=120(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8926380> [channelNumber=124(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba89267a0> [channelNumber=128(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8926bc0> [channelNumber=132(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8926fe0> [channelNumber=136(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 140 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 144 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8927400> [channelNumber=140(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 <CWChannel: 0x7f9ba8925390> [channelNumber=144(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.248 )} took 0.0001 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.256 IPC: <airportd[54]> INVALIDATED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.276 IPC: <airportd[54]> ADDED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.276 Info: <airportd[54]> SCAN request received from pid 1017 (AutopanoGiga) with priority 0
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 1 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 2 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 3 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 4 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 5 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 6 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe22710> [channelNumber=1(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe07cb0> [channelNumber=2(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe1bf20> [channelNumber=3(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe07ca0> [channelNumber=4(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe00690> [channelNumber=5(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0daf0> [channelNumber=6(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 )} took 0.0003 seconds, returned 2 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 7 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 8 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 9 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 10 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 11 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 36 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0e1a0> [channelNumber=7(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe22050> [channelNumber=8(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe1dc50> [channelNumber=9(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe19080> [channelNumber=10(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe16d80> [channelNumber=11(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe30630> [channelNumber=36(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.277 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 40 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 44 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 48 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 149 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 153 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 157 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0c660> [channelNumber=40(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2c1f0> [channelNumber=44(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2c370> [channelNumber=48(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe1c360> [channelNumber=149(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe25140> [channelNumber=153(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0acc0> [channelNumber=157(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 1 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 161 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 165 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 12 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 13 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 52 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 56 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe07140> [channelNumber=161(5GHz), channelWidth={80MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe30cb0> [channelNumber=165(5GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}, active],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe29350> [channelNumber=12(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe06d10> [channelNumber=13(2GHz), channelWidth={20MHz}],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe31430> [channelNumber=52(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe08830> [channelNumber=56(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 60 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 64 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 100 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 104 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 108 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 112 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2afd0> [channelNumber=60(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe1dfb0> [channelNumber=64(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe29500> [channelNumber=100(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0b4d0> [channelNumber=104(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2eb80> [channelNumber=108(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe296a0> [channelNumber=112(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.278 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 116 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 120 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 124 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 128 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 132 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 136 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0b750> [channelNumber=116(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe15ef0> [channelNumber=120(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe0d2d0> [channelNumber=124(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe07770> [channelNumber=128(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe1a9d0> [channelNumber=132(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2f5f0> [channelNumber=136(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 )} took 0.0002 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 140 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga on channel 144 does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 Scan: <airportd[54]> Cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga does not require a live scan
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 AutoJoin: <airportd[54]> Successful cache-assisted scan request for AutopanoGiga with channels {(
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe20790> [channelNumber=140(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(+1)}, DFS],
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 <CWChannel: 0x7f9babe2ffb0> [channelNumber=144(5GHz), channelWidth={40MHz(-1)}, DFS]
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.279 )} took 0.0001 seconds, returned 0 results
Mon Apr 3 16:49:11.287 IPC: <airportd[54]> INVALIDATED XPC CLIENT CONNECTION [AutopanoGiga (pid=1017, euid=502, egid=20)]

Didn’t really get much of a feeling for the ferocity of the storm that hit last night, the tail end of Tropical Cyclone Debbie, but going for a wander down to the river this afternoon, and clearly, we copped a fair wallop.

Somewhat delayed, but Here’s a reflection on 2016. It’s been a relatively quiet year, mostly spent on nagging health issues. Lots of physio rebuilding my knee, which periodically gets worse, in my opinion, because the post-operative rehab physio in 2012 got me jumping too early. Just as that was coming good, I managed to tear a ligament in my dominant hand, one that keeps the tendon centred over the top of the first knuckle, meaning it fell off to the side when I bent my finger down enough. A pretty terrifying experience all round, but after 2 months in a splint it’s slowly getting better.

In terms of art, the beginning of the year saw Surfing The Deathline – Fourth Dose released, and now at the beginning of 2017, Fifth Dose is out, which means it’s all done – I could be hit by a bus tomorrow, and the work is more or less what I intended. Finishing a project that’s been going for 14 years is interesting. It didn’t really have the commercial success I would have liked, but at least it’s done. Most importantly, I’m now free to look to new projects.

Some other notable events this year were a small retrospective of student sculptures at a laneways festival, and delivering a PetchaKucha talk about The Metaning at Nambour.

Going in to 2017, what are my goals? Right now, I’m going back through the old issues of Surfing The Deathine, and updating them to the style of the last part. Then? I’ve got a bunch of photographic projects planned, some will require space to set up lights etc, some are landscape based. Along with that, there’s sculpture – I’m going to need space to weld, after which I’m going to try to learn TIG welding properly, so I can do fine and neat work. Things to look at sculpturally are revisiting the ethernet figurative piece, even if it means I just have to buy bulk cable in various shades of blue. I’ve also got to get serious about investigating bending perspex rod without blistering it, so I can build small versions of my valve sculptures.

I think that’s enough to have on my plate for the moment.

The anachronism of using wood to create a case for a technological item, is perhaps blunted by the use of kevlar in the laminate. It provides scratch protection when placing the phone up or down on a flat surface, especially for the camera lens. A big plus is the minimalist logo on the back – too many cases have the casemaker’s name in huge letters.

While the packaging states it’s for the iPhone 5/5s, it’s also fine with the SE.

I recently received a communication from a representative if the Australian Copyright lobby, regarding comments I had made on Twitter at the fact that surveys of copyright association members fail to isolate territorial copyright as a question (should it exist?) on its own. This has the effect of preventing members from furnishing their representative organisation with an opinion that could clash with their stated policy, driven as it is, in my opinion, by publishers and middlemen, rather than creators. The response I started writing became so long, that it felt like the sort of thing that makes you look like a crazy person when you email it to someone – “here’s my manifesto”, so to speak.

Therefore, I’m presenting a mildly rewritten version here, where ranty manifestos belong, and sending a short version to the original intended recipient.

As a creator of copyright material, I fundamentally disagree with one of the positions for which Copyright Australia / Viscopy has been an advocate – territorial licensing.

From the outset, lest I appear some sort of Pirate Party sympathiser, I like copyright. I actually think, like shares or land, it should never expire. I think it is a fundamental problem that an artist can’t pass on to their descendants in perpetuity, the sole economic rights to their life’s work, whereas a slumlord with a portfolio of apartments, or a farmer with acres of fields, or a daytrader with a share portfolio, can. All of these require a person to invest their time, and their finances to build up to a point where they’re revenue-positive, but only one gets repossessed by the state 70 years after its creator’s death. Counter-intuitively, it’s the one which doesn’t detract from a finite pool that gets nationalised, whereas land owners can keep benefitting from their exclusive economic rights in perpetuity.

However, I think the protections of copyright carry a social contract that the copyright industry is failing to uphold, and that this failure is at the root of the problem of piracy, and the world-wide movement against copyright.

As members of various copyright organisations, we’re asked for opinions via surveys, which are used by the organisations to lobby government and direct public policy.

The only questions addressing regional licensing in recent surveys, have bundled it with other issues, so that it was impossible for members to express an opinion against regional licensing, without also coming out against something else, which I recall as not being against.

I find this troubling, as it suggests those creating the surveys are either so out of touch / embedded in an echo chamber, that they can’t see the sentiment outside their windows, or that it reflects a, frankly disingenuous, attempt to direct the “results” towards a predetermined outcome.

I suspect that if CA were to survey creators, rather than middlemen or publishers, on this issue in isolation (obviously, with a case that was fairly stated, for both perspectives), it would find most in favour of protecting consumer’s rights to participate in the global economy, and against geographical licensing.

I also suspect it would be hard to find anyone who wasn’t a current, or former, employee of Foxtel, who thinks it’s reasonable for them to have to subscribe to that service, for one tv show which can be bought on its own outside Australia. Or indeed, to watch the full Formula 1 racing season, which anti-siphoning rules have failed to keep on free-to-air TV. Ask Netflix’s Australian customers how they feel about not having access to the same library, at the same price, that American consumers have. Ask yourself why Choice magazine is recommending everyone use VPNs to get around geoblocking.

The Australian people understand, that if their jobs are now subject to global competition, able to be shifted to places where labour is cheaper, then it is only reasonable that they have the same ability to offshore their consumption to markets where products are cheaper.

I would put it to the reader, that the disrespect for this basic right, and the willingness to take advantage of Globalisation (eg to manufacture DVDs cheaply overseas) when it suits, while working to deny those rights to our customers, robs us of the moral high ground to present the case that actually matters – if you access content that its creator put a price on, you must pay that price to access that content.

Arguments about how many jobs are created as a result of regional licensing lose their moral weight when those jobs depend on market manipulation, interfering with free global trade, and rent-seeking behaviour, none of which, consumers should, or indeed do, feel any obligation to protect, especially when it’s not their choice to do so.

By illustration, here’s the archetypical example – I want to buy Dan Koeppel’s book, “Banana” – a geopolitical history of banana cultivation world wide. I want to read it on my iPad, since I don’t have space to keep any more paper books. It’s available for sale on the American iBooks store, It’s available for sale on the American Kindle store, I even follow, and am followed by Dan on Twitter, and have had conversations with him about problems getting Banana.

Penguin (Australia) hold the territorial rights to both print and eBook versions. They have not bothered to make an eBook version available to Australian consumers, and territorial licensing means I can’t buy it from the American stores. They won’t spend the money and time to make it available, but they won’t let us get it anywhere else, either.

Why should the law, copyright advocates, or the Australian people, support this behaviour?